<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Overholser: Journalism As We Know It Is Over</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pjnet.org/post/1187/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pjnet.org/post/1187/</link>
	<description>Public Journalism Network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 21:59:16 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: tish grier</title>
		<link>http://pjnet.org/post/1187/comment-page-1/#comment-234</link>
		<dc:creator>tish grier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 14:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordpress.pjnet.org/post/1187/#comment-234</guid>
		<description>Len...

I read Overholser&#039;s &quot;manifesto&quot; also and bothered by the top-down tone of it all.  My comment on HufPo noted that it&#039;s going to take a lot more than what she proposed. 

To add something to what you suggest:  kick a group of journalists out of the newsroom and bring in a bunch of folks who know how to interact and what interaction is.  Give them a small amount of money to take a Journalism 101 class at whatever State U if y&#039;all believe it&#039;s so important, then pay them a fair wage, and let them bring the newsroom up to date.

Don&#039;t keep looking inside for innovation.  Look to those who are already innovating.

Many of the journalists (and other busnessfolk) can&#039;t get what interaction is because they stopped interacting a long time ago. They are hampered by a worldview that puts them above &quot;people&quot;--where people are only seen as subjects under some skewed &quot;objective&quot; microscope.  If one can only interact in the f2f world by projecting some kind of a personna, it&#039;s going to be a lot harder to become adept at it in internet-based spaces and communities.

There are, however, some of us who can manipulate both spaces.  Bring us in and let us be the leaders.

Oh, but that&#039;s probably asking way too much...   
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Len&#8230;</p>
<p>I read Overholser&#8217;s &#8220;manifesto&#8221; also and bothered by the top-down tone of it all.  My comment on HufPo noted that it&#8217;s going to take a lot more than what she proposed. </p>
<p>To add something to what you suggest:  kick a group of journalists out of the newsroom and bring in a bunch of folks who know how to interact and what interaction is.  Give them a small amount of money to take a Journalism 101 class at whatever State U if y&#8217;all believe it&#8217;s so important, then pay them a fair wage, and let them bring the newsroom up to date.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t keep looking inside for innovation.  Look to those who are already innovating.</p>
<p>Many of the journalists (and other busnessfolk) can&#8217;t get what interaction is because they stopped interacting a long time ago. They are hampered by a worldview that puts them above &#8220;people&#8221;&#8211;where people are only seen as subjects under some skewed &#8220;objective&#8221; microscope.  If one can only interact in the f2f world by projecting some kind of a personna, it&#8217;s going to be a lot harder to become adept at it in internet-based spaces and communities.</p>
<p>There are, however, some of us who can manipulate both spaces.  Bring us in and let us be the leaders.</p>
<p>Oh, but that&#8217;s probably asking way too much&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
