<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s The Biggest Threat to Newpapers? Maybe the Executives</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pjnet.org/post/1290/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pjnet.org/post/1290/</link>
	<description>Public Journalism Network</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 17:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bryan Murley</title>
		<link>http://pjnet.org/post/1290/#comment-262</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Murley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 18:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordpress.pjnet.org/post/1290/#comment-262</guid>
		<description>Yes. I saw this same sentiment expressed on Steve Yelvington's blog recently. Seems a spot on assessment. Back in the day, newspapers' main innovative need was how to justify full-color on the front page. Times have changed, and everyone realizes those rules don't apply any longer. There's more competition, more options, and fewer resources.

Very disruptive. I'd gladly buy a newspaper company if I had the money, but only to shake it up and see how to reinvent and succeed.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes. I saw this same sentiment expressed on Steve Yelvington&#8217;s blog recently. Seems a spot on assessment. Back in the day, newspapers&#8217; main innovative need was how to justify full-color on the front page. Times have changed, and everyone realizes those rules don&#8217;t apply any longer. There&#8217;s more competition, more options, and fewer resources.</p>
<p>Very disruptive. I&#8217;d gladly buy a newspaper company if I had the money, but only to shake it up and see how to reinvent and succeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
