<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rasmussen: Just 14% Get News from Print</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pjnet.org/post/1553/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pjnet.org/post/1553/</link>
	<description>Public Journalism Network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 11:46:59 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: &#8216;Newspaper upheaval isn&#8217;t cyclical, it&#8217;s tectonic&#8217; &#171; sans serif</title>
		<link>http://pjnet.org/post/1553/comment-page-1/#comment-721</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8216;Newspaper upheaval isn&#8217;t cyclical, it&#8217;s tectonic&#8217; &#171; sans serif</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 17:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pjnet.org/post/1553/#comment-721</guid>
		<description>[...] there, done that, and all they have got is more bad news that readers are deserting them in droves. Just 14 per cent of Americans now get their news from print. So there&#8217;s nothing to show as yet that API has cracked the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] there, done that, and all they have got is more bad news that readers are deserting them in droves. Just 14 per cent of Americans now get their news from print. So there&#8217;s nothing to show as yet that API has cracked the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Notes from a Teacher: Mark on Media &#187; Sunday squibs</title>
		<link>http://pjnet.org/post/1553/comment-page-1/#comment-667</link>
		<dc:creator>Notes from a Teacher: Mark on Media &#187; Sunday squibs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 01:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pjnet.org/post/1553/#comment-667</guid>
		<description>[...] Rasmussen: Just 14% Get News from Print. Len Witt passes along some numbers that are only surprising in how fast the &#8216;net is closing on television. Newspapers shouldn&#8217;t be surprised: TV has topped this list for some time now. As interesting are the stats on social networking. It&#8217;s a young folks game and those of us over 50 who are doing it are a tiny, tiny portion of the whole. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Rasmussen: Just 14% Get News from Print. Len Witt passes along some numbers that are only surprising in how fast the &#8216;net is closing on television. Newspapers shouldn&#8217;t be surprised: TV has topped this list for some time now. As interesting are the stats on social networking. It&#8217;s a young folks game and those of us over 50 who are doing it are a tiny, tiny portion of the whole. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jill</title>
		<link>http://pjnet.org/post/1553/comment-page-1/#comment-637</link>
		<dc:creator>Jill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 16:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pjnet.org/post/1553/#comment-637</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Leonard.  If you use an RSS feed reader, I&#039;d urge you to subscribe to Bill Sloat&#039;s blog. He does some great stuff there about media and other issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Leonard.  If you use an RSS feed reader, I&#8217;d urge you to subscribe to Bill Sloat&#8217;s blog. He does some great stuff there about media and other issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
