Comments on: Knight Challenge Grant for Youth under 25 http://pjnet.org/post/1568/ Public Journalism Network Mon, 21 Dec 2009 08:29:46 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: YouthLAB ‘07 » Blog Archive » Should MTV Get Grants for Social Good? http://pjnet.org/post/1568/comment-page-1/#comment-2518 YouthLAB ‘07 » Blog Archive » Should MTV Get Grants for Social Good? Tue, 02 Oct 2007 13:43:00 +0000 http://pjnet.org/post/1568/#comment-2518 [...] Chester Says: September 7th, 2007 at 10:37 am We have long had concerns about foundations funding media conglomerates to provide public service [...] [...] Chester Says: September 7th, 2007 at 10:37 am We have long had concerns about foundations funding media conglomerates to provide public service [...]

]]> By: YouthLAB ‘07 » Blog Archive » Young Creators Award http://pjnet.org/post/1568/comment-page-1/#comment-2467 YouthLAB ‘07 » Blog Archive » Young Creators Award Fri, 28 Sep 2007 15:33:27 +0000 http://pjnet.org/post/1568/#comment-2467 [...] Knight Challenge Grant for Youth under 25 [...] [...] Knight Challenge Grant for Youth under 25 [...]

]]> By: Jeffrey Chester http://pjnet.org/post/1568/comment-page-1/#comment-1464 Jeffrey Chester Fri, 07 Sep 2007 14:37:02 +0000 http://pjnet.org/post/1568/#comment-1464 We have long had concerns about foundations funding media conglomerates to provide public service content. So, the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation’s recent award of $700,000 to MTV was troubling for us. The grant, part of Knight’s News Challenge awards, was so MTV can create “a Knight Mobile Youth Journalist (Knight “MyJos”) in each of the 50 states and the District of Columbia to report weekly – on cell phones, and other media – on key issues including the environment, 2008 presidential election and sexual health.” Viacom’s 2006 revenues were $11.5 billion. Don’t you think there’s enough left over to pay for the mobile journalism program! The idea that MTV should be subsidized for contributing to public service is wrong-headed. Besides, MTV is engaged in such mobile activities to help build up its brand so it can earn more online advertising dollars. Journalism foundations such as Knight–and J-Schools–should be holding the media industry’s editorial feet to the fire, shaming them to spend more money on serious journalism. Knight should not be funding media conglomerates whose owner resides comfortably in Beverly Hills. Meanwhile, it what raises some interesting questions about “insider funding,” we note that Viacom’s MTV VP Ian Rowe serves on the Knight Foundation advisory committe for journalism. Rowe is quoted in the Knight Foundation press release announcing its News Challenge grants as a grantee spokesperson. Now Knight is again teaming with Viacom’s MTV to give away $500,000 to support “young people who have ideas for pushing journalism into the digital age.” It’s called the “Young Creators Award.” We hope all the money has come from Viacom. By the way, Knight and media beat reporters should be asking what MTV is doing with the data it can collect from mobile users. Will it engage in targeting for its other products? In what ways are the Knight supported work designed to build up the commercial role of MTV? How much is such pro-social ad campaigns worth to Viacom’s bottom-line? We have long had concerns about foundations funding media conglomerates to provide public service content. So, the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation’s recent award of $700,000 to MTV was troubling for us. The grant, part of Knight’s News Challenge awards, was so MTV can create “a Knight Mobile Youth Journalist (Knight “MyJos”) in each of the 50 states and the District of Columbia to report weekly – on cell phones, and other media – on key issues including the environment, 2008 presidential election and sexual health.” Viacom’s 2006 revenues were $11.5 billion. Don’t you think there’s enough left over to pay for the mobile journalism program! The idea that MTV should be subsidized for contributing to public service is wrong-headed. Besides, MTV is engaged in such mobile activities to help build up its brand so it can earn more online advertising dollars.

Journalism foundations such as Knight–and J-Schools–should be holding the media industry’s editorial feet to the fire, shaming them to spend more money on serious journalism. Knight should not be funding media conglomerates whose owner resides comfortably in Beverly Hills. Meanwhile, it what raises some interesting questions about “insider funding,” we note that Viacom’s MTV VP Ian Rowe serves on the Knight Foundation advisory committe for journalism. Rowe is quoted in the Knight Foundation press release announcing its News Challenge grants as a grantee spokesperson.

Now Knight is again teaming with Viacom’s MTV to give away $500,000 to support “young people who have ideas for pushing journalism into the digital age.” It’s called the “Young Creators Award.” We hope all the money has come from Viacom. By the way, Knight and media beat reporters should be asking what MTV is doing with the data it can collect from mobile users. Will it engage in targeting for its other products? In what ways are the Knight supported work designed to build up the commercial role of MTV? How much is such pro-social ad campaigns worth to Viacom’s bottom-line?

]]>