<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MediaWeek: CNN to Take on YouTube</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pjnet.org/post/1733/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pjnet.org/post/1733/</link>
	<description>Public Journalism Network</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Digidave</title>
		<link>http://pjnet.org/post/1733/#comment-4128</link>
		<dc:creator>Digidave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 22:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pjnet.org/post/1733/#comment-4128</guid>
		<description>Good story, but me thinkst they are over-estimating YouTube.

I don't think CNN wants pictures of dancing cats, babies and other nonesense which we find on YouTube. 

Current TV should be nervous though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good story, but me thinkst they are over-estimating YouTube.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think CNN wants pictures of dancing cats, babies and other nonesense which we find on YouTube. </p>
<p>Current TV should be nervous though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
