<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rethinking Journalism Ethics in a Changed Media World</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pjnet.org/post/1990/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pjnet.org/post/1990/</link>
	<description>Public Journalism Network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 21:59:16 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jamie Walker</title>
		<link>http://pjnet.org/post/1990/comment-page-1/#comment-7485</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 18:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pjnet.org/?p=1990#comment-7485</guid>
		<description>The problem is with the individual writing the piece. There is a great truth of humanity which states, &quot;You cannot succeed at something you secretly despise.&quot; Until journalism embraces the idea of requiring that a piece pass a neutralism test before being published, and abandoning the &quot;WE will tell you what you think and determine what the news REALLY means,&quot; nothing is going to change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem is with the individual writing the piece. There is a great truth of humanity which states, &#8220;You cannot succeed at something you secretly despise.&#8221; Until journalism embraces the idea of requiring that a piece pass a neutralism test before being published, and abandoning the &#8220;WE will tell you what you think and determine what the news REALLY means,&#8221; nothing is going to change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

