I just would like to say hi to Len and Buzz, both of whom I interviewed back in 2002, when I was a Fulbright scholar in Minnesota.

In fact, I interviewed many of those journalists and scholars who have participated in public journalism movement. I just would like to let all of them know that I am still alive and still trying to practice public journalism.

Our paper is a huge organiziation with a circluation of 8 million. Mainstream reporters in our newsroom are busy gaining access to the powerful figures in central government and ruling parties.

Yes, I have to do some of that. In fact for a year, I covered the prime minister’s office resided by Mr. Koizumi, a good friend of GWB.

That was a valuable experience because I now understand better how “conventioal” political reporters think and act, which in many cases run counter to the philosophy of public journalism. They tend to treat readers just spectators of political fireworks by trying to be “entertaining”.

Recently, Japan is trying to decentralize and give more power to local governments where people could decide what they need and how much they pay for that. It is reaction to the fact that, in as long as history of modern Japan, political power has been concentrated in the central government. I believe it is a serious movement of democracy. And for news media, it is a wonderful opportunity to reinvent itself and be “useful” for our readers who have potential to participate in public sphere when power and responsiblity are given back. I think that ideas of public journalism could be very useful and relevant when our society is trying to change, possibly in very fundamental ways.

I dare say public journalism has taken a root in our newsroom. But I am still here to spread viruses. And it is a good time to do so.

Journalism was the essential craft of the era of enlightened democracy - a time when the pressing questions were about self-determination, our responsibilities as citizens and our relationship with a higher being. Journalism was a path to understanding and a check on the new powers of individuals and governments.

Unfortunately, we are no longer in that era.

We are in the era of economic relevance - where the pressing question is about what value individuals contribute and where morality is determined more by the rules of the marketplace than by theology (even within most organized religions).

Instead of citizens, we are now consumers. Our relationship with government is based on a consumer model now. In too many cases, our personal relationships are based on that model as well.

The problem news organizations have is that we are built to speak to people as citizens, but people now see themselves as consumers. When we try to meet them as consumers, we lose our way as journalists - “targeted” sections, demographic-driven quotas for front pages, partisan newscasts, deals linking content and advertising. The list of sins is long.

So here’s a way to approach our readers as citizens within the restraints of our era of economic relevance.

Economic relevance breaks things into two categories - commodity and craft. It is helpful to think about what we offer readers in those two categories. Our commodity is information. Our craft is journalism.

Information - everything from obituaries and calendars to stocks, property transfers and TV listings - has value at a microlevel. Information is what people expect from their newspaper. You increase your base value by increasing the breadth of data/information you have. This is answering the basic consumer question - is this product useful?

As space has tightened in U.S. newspapers, information has been cut, thus eroding the core value of the product to the consumer.

Journalism - the context, stories, analysis and investigations - is what determines consumer loyalty and lasting value. Watchdog journalism, stories of success, solutions-driven reporting - these answer the second key consumer question, does this product/company care about me?

Public journalism is about answering the second question, but it has happened at a time when newspapers are increasingly failing to answer the first. We make people pay for obituaries, weddings, birth announcements and we’re gutting other essential information from the paper.

Newsrooms need to see the value in all the raw information they collect, find what other information they can gather efficiently and concentrate on how to deliver to consumers.

That information will lead to better journalism - more context, more understanding of patterns, better access to people. And then it will be up to us to show people how they are both consumers and citizens.

In the era of economic relevance, information pays for journalism.