<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PJNet &#187; 2nd Amendment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pjnet.org/post/category/2nd-amendment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pjnet.org</link>
	<description>Public Journalism Network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 05:04:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Time to Take a Stand for Free Speech</title>
		<link>http://pjnet.org/post/1583/</link>
		<comments>http://pjnet.org/post/1583/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 19:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Leonard Witt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2nd Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moveon.org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Restoring the Trust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pjnet.org/post/1583/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some of you might have noticed that today I have taken a rather strong stand on protecting free speech. Here are the two headlines that reflect my feelings:
Let&#8217;s start first with my Op-Ed piece today that was published in the Atlanta Journal-Constitution: Congress can&#8217;t muzzle free speech: Condemning Petraeus critics, lawmakers ignore Constitution
The second is my [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of you might have noticed that today I have taken a rather strong stand on protecting free speech. Here are the two headlines that reflect my feelings:</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s start first with my Op-Ed piece today that was published in the Atlanta Journal-Constitution: <a href="http://www.ajc.com/opinion/content/printedition/2007/09/24/witted0924.html">Congress can&#8217;t muzzle free speech: Condemning Petraeus critics, lawmakers ignore Constitution</a></p>
<p>The second is my letter to Romenesko with the headline: <a href="http://poynter.org/forum/view_post.asp?id=12858">Witt blasts NYT public editor&#8217;s column on MoveOn.org ad</a> .</p>
<p> My premise in the first is that the U.S. Senate has injured the First Amendment of the United States Constitution <a href="http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=110&amp;session=1&amp;vote=00344">by voting to</a>: &#8220;strongly condemn personal attacks on the honor and integrity of General Petraeus and all members of the United States Armed Forces.&#8221; If we have to worry about one of the highest legal branches of the Federal government &#8220;condemning&#8221; our use of free speech, then how free is that speech.</p>
<p>In my open letter to Clark Hoyt, the public editor of The New York Times, I say he is too worried about decorum at the expense of free speech.  As you might notice from the tone of my letter, I am more worried about free speech than I am about decorum.</p>
<p>It is time that all of us to speak out now, and help to put the brakes on the trend to attack free speech via condemning its speakers when we don&#8217;t like what we hear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pjnet.org/post/1583/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

