<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PJNet &#187; robots</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pjnet.org/post/category/robots/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pjnet.org</link>
	<description>Public Journalism Network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 05:04:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Panacea: Citizen and Pro Journalists as Robots</title>
		<link>http://pjnet.org/post/1713/</link>
		<comments>http://pjnet.org/post/1713/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 04:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Leonard Witt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Citizen journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Community Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computation Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crowdsourcing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Embedded journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hyperlocal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism Business Models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Participatory journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reinventing Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robots]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pjnet.org/post/1713/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When I read Rodney Brooks&#8217; book Flesh and Machines: How Robots Will Change Us, I was struck by one insight. He wrote that Japan has an aging population, it will need help from Third-World immigrants. However, it does not want a flood of immigrants. So, Brooks says that they are trying to develop robot like [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I read Rodney Brooks&#8217; book <a href="http://www.kurzweilai.net/meme/frame.html?main=/articles/art0397.html?">Flesh and Machines: How Robots Will Change Us</a>, I was struck by one insight. He wrote that Japan has an aging population, it will need help from Third-World immigrants. However, it does not want a flood of immigrants. So, Brooks says that they are trying to develop robot like machines that can be controlled from afar.</p>
<p>So rather having an immigrant lift your aging mother from a bed directly, you have a robotic arm controlled via computer by a someone in a far away land do it. Robots are not smart enough to do a lot tasks by themselves, but if they are remotely controlled by a human, they can do thousands of tasks, even delicate ones.</p>
<p>So now that brings us to our citizen journalists as robots controlled by professional journalists or better yet professional journalists controlled by citizens or the true panacea for higher quality journalism is to have it both ways.</p>
<p>Here is the experiment at work. Robert Scoble, whom the BBC calls the <a href="http://scobleizer.com/">blogger</a> and <a href="http://www.qik.com/scobleizer">videoblogger </a>extraordinaire, was at the <a href="http://www.weforum.org/en/index.htm">World Economic Forum</a> in Davos interviewing folks for his website, and <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/davos08/2008/01/now_thats_what_i_call_interact.html">BBC blogger Tim Weber watched</a> as Scoble interviewed Marc Benioff, a Davos participant:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230;not with a big video camera but a small Nokia mobile phone, that sent a live video stream of the interview to his website. So far, so ambitious. Now comes the stunner. While he was doing the interview, Robert saw live on his phone screen the comments and questions posted by his viewers.</p>
<p>Just to illustrate how it works: When Marc pulled me into the conversation, within half a minute Robert had live on his screen a reader&#8217;s query about the BBC&#8217;s video-on-demand policy. Robert asked me the question straight away, and as we continued talking about the mobile phone industry and video on the web, more BBC-related queries piled up.</p></blockquote>
<p>Since a citizen journalist shouldn&#8217;t be expected to do the delicate task of doing a professional interview and since a professional journalist shouldn&#8217;t be expected to do the complicated task of getting citizens involved on the scene when he or she is out on a interview, we now can bring in help from afar via technology, just as we would if we were really talking about robots.</p>
<p>Now this is extremely big &#8212; a stunner really &#8212; because it can change the equation of how news is gathered and reported, especially for smaller scale equations like with my <a href="http://pjnet.org/representativejournalism/">Representative Journalism</a> idea where groups of a thousand or smaller can hire their own journalists.</p>
<p><a href="http://twitter.com/Scobleizer">Just as Scoble did</a>, if I am a reporter, I would use Twitter to tell my audience that I am on my way to interview Mr. Big. In five minutes, I will be live streaming the interview back to my website or to your iPhone, please jump in with your questions.</p>
<p>Or if you are a citizen journalist reporting on Mr. Big, you Twitter whichever newsrooms might be interested in the interview. The professional editors log on to your livestream at your website or on their cell phones and can do two things: 1) quickly verify that you are in fact interviewing Mr. Big, and 2) can feed you questions.  The mainstream then has a verified, professionally enhanced interview that it can use in its stories. Even when things happen spontaneously.</p>
<p>The citizen journalist gets to do a fun, exciting or interesting interview, maybe with monetary compensation, without worrying about the more complicated stuff that is necessary to finish a full-blown story. The mainstream media expand their reporting resources.  </p>
<p>Of course, the real panacea is that pro and amateur journalists Twitter their editors and citizen bases at the same time. So during an interview  the reporter, the editors and the citizenery all are weighing into the interview. It is putting <a href="http://beatblogging.typepad.com/">Jay Rosen&#8217;s Beatblogging</a> into real time, any time. It is citizen, civic and public journalism Nirvana.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pjnet.org/post/1713/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

