<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Representative Journalism: Ethical Concerns</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pjnet.org/representativejournalism/post/5/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pjnet.org/representativejournalism/post/5/</link>
	<description>A Public Journalism Network weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 18:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Noah Kunin</title>
		<link>http://pjnet.org/representativejournalism/post/5/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Noah Kunin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 12:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pjnet.org/representativejournalism/post/5/#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Without Fear or Favor (WFOF) is definitely a must have for the core values of Representative Journalism.

Systems can also be put into place to cover those scenarios where WFOF is weakened - the Rep. Journalist should operate in an environment where his Rep. Journalists peers monitor his work and can collectively flag him if his work has been compromised.  

Just having a singular editor monitor the Rep. Journalists in a single news area (let's say Politics) doesn't have enough redundancy.  But, if Rep. Journalists from say, Sports and Business are also monitoring a Rep.  Journalist the chance of a collapse in WFOF of all three quality assurance monitors is significantly less likely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Without Fear or Favor (WFOF) is definitely a must have for the core values of Representative Journalism.</p>
<p>Systems can also be put into place to cover those scenarios where WFOF is weakened - the Rep. Journalist should operate in an environment where his Rep. Journalists peers monitor his work and can collectively flag him if his work has been compromised.  </p>
<p>Just having a singular editor monitor the Rep. Journalists in a single news area (let&#8217;s say Politics) doesn&#8217;t have enough redundancy.  But, if Rep. Journalists from say, Sports and Business are also monitoring a Rep.  Journalist the chance of a collapse in WFOF of all three quality assurance monitors is significantly less likely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
